Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x1)) → x1
a(b(c(x1))) → b(c(b(c(a(a(b(x1)))))))
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x1)) → x1
a(b(c(x1))) → b(c(b(c(a(a(b(x1)))))))
Q is empty.
Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A(b(c(x1))) → A(a(b(x1)))
A(b(c(x1))) → A(b(x1))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x1)) → x1
a(b(c(x1))) → b(c(b(c(a(a(b(x1)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A(b(c(x1))) → A(a(b(x1)))
A(b(c(x1))) → A(b(x1))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x1)) → x1
a(b(c(x1))) → b(c(b(c(a(a(b(x1)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
A(b(c(x1))) → A(a(b(x1)))
A(b(c(x1))) → A(b(x1))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:
POL(c(x1)) = 2 + (2)x_1
POL(a(x1)) = (2)x_1
POL(A(x1)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(b(x1)) = (1/2)x_1
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
a(b(x1)) → x1
a(b(c(x1))) → b(c(b(c(a(a(b(x1)))))))
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x1)) → x1
a(b(c(x1))) → b(c(b(c(a(a(b(x1)))))))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.